Yesterday, I received the 100th telephone solicitation to subscribe to the Vancouver Sun, and I turned them down for the 100th time.

I came to the realization 12 years ago that, whatever the Sun's target market is, I am not a part of it. I came to this realization because the Sun ran not just one, but two articles detailing predictions from astrologers on what was going to happen in the coming year. (One of the predictions was that Gordon Wilson would become the leader of the federal Liberal Party.)

By coincidence, my decision to not spend any of my hard-earned money on the Sun was validated yet again by a column by Michael Campbell that appeared that day (October 4, 2005). Campbell's writings are as silly as those of any astrologer, and his economic analyses have only slightly more depth than those of Chance Gardiner, a character portrayed by Peter Sellers in the film "Being There".

The column I refer to has the title "Smokers have known for years it could kill them."

Campbell's claim is factually incorrect, and easily disprovable. All you have to do is go to the "supressed facts" area of the smokersrightscanada.org web site, where it says that "not one single death has ever been etiologically assigned to tobacco."

Or, you could go the the discussion area of the mychoice.ca site, which is administered and paid for by the tobacco industry. Someone there who calls himself "fxr" wrote, "Where did you get the idea smoking has been proven to be harmfull (sic)? The only proof has been theoretic research. I have seen no indication of any physical proof of this harm." Or, there's this statement from "thepest": "FACT: TOBACCO AS (sic) NEVER BEEN FOUND TO BE CAUSING LUNG CANCERS OF ANY KIND."

Now, we should ask why it is that in 2005, there are still people who believe such things. Denial is obviously part of it. However, it's a fact that for many years after the release of the Surgeon General's report in 1964, the tobacco industry's PR people made persistent efforts to downplay the findings of the report, even while their own scientists were confirming the toxicity of cigarettes.

This is one of the many reasons why people whose lives have been damaged by cigarettes are entitled to have their day in court. Let's give the tobacco industry the opportunity to answer for this and many other things they have done over the years, and allow judges and juries to determine the appropriate level of guilt.

Campbell's piece also included this gem: "It's just that I find the self-righteous attitudes of the anti-smoking Gestapo so obnoxious that, despite being a lifelong non-smoker, I'd consider starting... just to get under their skin.  But what do I know?  I'm still trying to figure out why so many rabid anti-smoking activists also push to make smoking marijuana legal."

In his use of the term "Gestapo", Campbell uses the same cowardly tactic as his fellow sycophant Terence Corcoran; as long as you don't attach any names to the people you accuse, you can't get sued by them. (Corcoran learned this lesson the hard way; he slipped up and named Garfield Mahood of the Non-Smokers' Rights Association in one of his columns and found himself, and his employer, being sued for libel.)

Campbell now has the opportunity to prove that I'm wrong. Michael, if there's some anti-smoking assembly around that arrests people and interrogates and tortures them with no regard for warrants or habeas corpus, you have a responsibility as a journalist to give us their names and the location of their headquarters. Don't hold back on the details.

The Fraser Institute: Economic think tank or front for the Tobacco Industry? A paper published by the Non-Smokers' Rights Association

Comments   

0 #3 Rick Barnes 2005-11-15 15:48
Michael Campbell is being a bit silly for sure. His attitude is old and the mirror image of his brother. Campbell received a great deal of money (his Liberal party did) from the entertainment business folks that run bars.

The reward was a ramping down of the smoking indoors stuff broughtin by WCB.

I am trying to quit, will keep at it till I do. For Campbell to go on about those wanting to end smoking is just a pay back to his brother's buddies in Granville's entertaiment area.

If he wants to start smoking to annoy non-smokers go right ahead. Do it outside Michael.

Politics in BC (politicsinbc.blogspot.com)Queer Thoughts (queerthoughts.blogspot.com)
Quote
0 #2 Sera Kirk 2005-10-05 07:10
The tobacco industry and its acolytes used to deny that smoking caused premature death; now they brag about it.

I always find it interesting that those who advocate encouraging smoking as the "final solution" for caring for our elderly are the same people who routinely refer to those fighting for health and quality of life as "Gestapo" and "Nazis".
Quote
0 #1 Jennifer 2005-10-05 07:09
Hi Bob,

Righteous outrage man!
Thanks for bringing forward this, yet another, example of atrocious journalism. Campbell writes and sounds like a tired old man....the world has seen the adverse effects of the actions and opinions of tired old men. To deny that smoking kills is, as you say, ridiculous. We know better. And yet, our society still allows these death sticks to be sold and we tax payers get stuck with the health costs of a sick citizenry. I think the tobacco companies are completely liable for their smoke screen tactics and lies about the harm, the toxic and addictive additives, and the cost to society for their massive profits. Sponsoring sporting events doesn't pay back for the harm.

Campbell's a hack, and if he keeps his promise to become a smoker, he's making himself extinct. Given his archaic opinions, he's probably turned most of his family away so at least he's not causing innocents to suffer with 2nd hand smoke.
Quote

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Other articles in Blog

My Tienanmen Square experience 05 Jun 2014

Virginia Intermont College closes its doors 26 May 2014

How to play tennis in Mexico 02 Dec 2013

A $40 billion bad idea in Nicaragua 12 Jul 2013

How the US can help Mexico 10 Jun 2013

- Entire Category -